Topic: Re: Who is better Federer or Nadal

[HarryWild]

It all depends on who they had to play in the previous round!  If one had a easy time and the other did not; that could be the deciding key to who wins if both are playing each other.  In general; I would have to now go with Federer!  He not injured!

[Djokovic Champion]

Most likely Federer will forever be best in history.

[swish]

well if you go by the sheer volume of accomplishments, it has to be Fed.
 
he has 16 slams, 1000 masters cup titles, and 5 years as #1.
 
2nd is clay warrior.
 
3rd is no-djok.
 
right now it is clear that no-djok is better than all of them. that is why he is #1 and the others are not.

Agreed CD the Magnificent.
 
The pure weight of the numbers is astounding and go on for pages.
 
Even as the frequency of adding to these numbers is decreasing the totals are increasing.
 
It's not over yet so hang on awhile.
 
 

[hercules]

affirmative general swish.

[Alex]

well if you go by the sheer volume of accomplishments, it has to be Fed.
 
he has 16 slams, 1000 masters cup titles, and 5 years as #1.
 
2nd is clay warrior.
 
3rd is no-djok.
 
right now it is clear that no-djok is better than all of them. that is why he is #1 and the others are not.

Agreed CD the Magnificent.
 
The pure weight of the numbers is astounding and go on for pages.
 
Even as the frequency of adding to these numbers is decreasing the totals are increasing.
 
It's not over yet so hang on awhile.

well, this is not a brainer. both herc and swish are right. based on results... 1. Fed 2. Nadal 3. Djok ...

[Djokovic Champion]

well if you go by the sheer volume of accomplishments, it has to be Fed.
 
he has 16 slams, 1000 masters cup titles, and 5 years as #1.
 
2nd is clay warrior.
 
3rd is no-djok.
 
right now it is clear that no-djok is better than all of them. that is why he is #1 and the others are not.

Agreed CD the Magnificent.
 
The pure weight of the numbers is astounding and go on for pages.
 
Even as the frequency of adding to these numbers is decreasing the totals are increasing.
 
It's not over yet so hang on awhile.

well, this is not a brainer. both herc and swish are right. based on results... 1. Fed 2. Nadal 3. Djok ...

Yes, but currently is 1-Djokovic, 2-Nadal and 3-Federer.

[hercules]

negative.
 
 
currently we are in the clay season.
 
clay season = domination = clay warrior = #1

[Djokovic Champion]

negative.
 
 
currently we are in the clay season.
 
clay season = domination = clay warrior = #1

Negative. Djokovic wins Australian Open, the Grand Slam of the season. He is the number one.

[duchuy89]

I love Rafa

[Alex]

negative.
 
 
currently we are in the clay season.
 
clay season = domination = clay warrior = #1

it's hilarious how you can twist things  (still love ya bud) ... If Djokovic wins RG, I will humiliate both you and Shank to no end 

[Djokovic Champion]

negative.
 
 
currently we are in the clay season.
 
clay season = domination = clay warrior = #1

it's hilarious how you can twist things  (still love ya bud) ... If Djokovic wins RG, I will humiliate both you and Shank to no end 

I too. And Djokovic will win Roland Garros and Olympics.

[Alex]

I love Rafa

welcome to the board.  very insightful first post, sorry couldn't help it, but keep posting. 

[Start da Game]

you mean is who better.......i think nadal is the best......he is the only one out there who has proven his ability on all the three major surfaces by winning multiple slams on all three major surfaces in tennis.......

[Alex]

shank, didn't Federer win on all surfaces? not sure how Nadal is the best ... let's try to be a bit more objective here 

[Djokovic Champion]

Federer and Nadal are fantastic players, Federer is more skilled, and Nadal has an extraordinary physique, as well as Djokovic.

[Start da Game]

shank, didn't Federer win on all surfaces? not sure how Nadal is the best ... let's try to be a bit more objective here 

fed's french was a big fluke and he doesn't hold multiple slams on all three major surfaces anyway.......djokovic has a very long way yet to go to even enter the discussion.......

nadal is only 25 and the slam count is bound to go up.......with another wimbledon and another hardcourt slam, he will become the only one with at least 3 slams on all the three major surfaces in history of tennis.......heck he is already the only one in history to hold at least 2 slams on all three major surfaces(clay, grass and hards).......

[Alex]

shank, didn't Federer win on all surfaces? not sure how Nadal is the best ... let's try to be a bit more objective here 

fed's french was a big fluke and he doesn't hold multiple slams on all three major surfaces anyway.......djokovic has a very long way yet to go to even enter the discussion.......

nadal is only 25 and the slam count is bound to go up.......with another wimbledon and another hardcourt slam, he will become the only one with at least 3 slams on all the three major surfaces in history of tennis.......heck he is already the only one in history to hold at least 2 slams on all three major surfaces(clay, grass and hards).......

well, I  kinda agree about Rog's fluke win at RG. but he still  won ... let's twist thing here ... I appreciate Nole winning 5 slams in the Fedal era more than Nadal winning his 10 majors or Fed winning 16