I have to agree.. even though I like Murray and hate his on court behavior, I do have to say that not just because he has some Masters 1000 on his belt will put him in the pedestal Djokovic, Rafa and Federer have won.. He doesn't belong to be referred as the top 4... Right now, there is only a top 3 and I would even bet if you ask ANY tennis player who they'd rather play and gave him the "top 4", 99.99% would pick Murray!! Hands down...
But ask them who they'd rather play and gave him just 3 choices (Fed, Nadal and Djokovic) the result would be very competitive probably....
So, no.. Murray doesn't have what it takes and at least hasn't proved that he should be "categorized" in that range of players.. Until Murray can prove something, he doesn't deserve to be in this group who have fought and gone the limit to be as competitive as they are right now...