Author Topic: WTA ranking points sytem for 2012!  (Read 690 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HarryWild

  • Tennis God
  • ******
  • Posts: 708
WTA ranking points sytem for 2012!
« on: September 10, 2012, 01:53:18 AM »
The WTA rankings are based on a 52-week, cumulative system. A player's ranking is determined by her results
at a maximum of 16 tournaments for singles and 11 for doubles.
The tournaments that count towards a player's ranking are those that yield the highest ranking points during
the rolling 52-week period. They must include points from the Grand Slams, Premier Mandatory tournaments
and the WTA Championships. For Top 20 players, their best two results at Premier 5 tournaments (Doha, Rome,
Cincinnati, Montréal/Toronto and Tokyo) will also count.
In order to appear on the WTA rankings, players must earn ranking points in at least 3 tournaments, or a
minimum of 10 singles ranking points or 10 doubles ranking points in one or more tournaments.

See link for details: http://www.wtatennis.com/SEWTATour-Archive/Rankings_Stats/howitworks.pdf


Online Babblelot

  • Tennis God
  • ******
  • Posts: 32686
  • Gender: Male
  • Chicago, IL
Re: WTA ranking points sytem for 2012!
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2012, 11:00:10 AM »
Here's what I would do, both tours.

Never talk about the 52-week ranking; its only purpose is to seed players at tournaments.

Only speak about the Race Rankings because YE ranking is the goal, not weekly. The way it works today, it's tantamount to saying the Cubs were in first place in June but finished the year in 4th. Who cares they were in 1st in June? Nobody. All sports fans care about is who finished the season at #1. Telling fans there are basically two #1s simultaneously is completely retarded. Counting weeks at #1 is embarrassing :paper bag:

I can't imagine people other than fanboys want to hear statements like: "Federer is #1 but Nole leads the 2012 Race." That's completely retarded. In 2012, Nole has been #1 virtually wire-to-wire. They do this in every sport. Easy for other sports fans to follow. Then, at the time of the majors (which you'll get the broadest spectrum of viewer) you can explain the seedings as being based on the 52-week system. But that's it. The 52-week system need never be mentioned but 4 times a year.

And if they simply did it this way, we'll never have to hear Dallas say, "Serena won 2 majors but is ranked #4?"   :confused1: 

If for no other reason, do it for Dallas.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2012, 11:07:51 AM by Babblelot »
1995 USO, 1997 USO, 2004 USO, 2005 RG, 2005 USO, 2006 RG, 2006 USO, 2007 USO, 2008 RG, 2008 USO, 2009 USO, 2010 USO, 2011 USO, 2012 USOhttp://www.gifsoup.com/view4/1856936/2005safin-o.gif
http://www.gifsoup.com/view1/1857331/2004gaudio-o.gif

Offline Dallas

  • Global Moderator
  • Tennis God
  • ******
  • Posts: 30573
  • Gender: Female
  • Federer-Wawrinka-Serena-Venus-Victoria
    • http://tennisworld.typepad.com/tennisworld/2007/01/monday_net_post.html#comment-27147061
Re: WTA ranking points sytem for 2012!
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2012, 11:41:18 AM »
Here's what I would do, both tours.

Never talk about the 52-week ranking; its only purpose is to seed players at tournaments.

Only speak about the Race Rankings because YE ranking is the goal, not weekly. The way it works today, it's tantamount to saying the Cubs were in first place in June but finished the year in 4th. Who cares they were in 1st in June? Nobody. All sports fans care about is who finished the season at #1. Telling fans there are basically two #1s simultaneously is completely retarded. Counting weeks at #1 is embarrassing :paper bag:

I can't imagine people other than fanboys want to hear statements like: "Federer is #1 but Nole leads the 2012 Race." That's completely retarded. In 2012, Nole has been #1 virtually wire-to-wire. They do this in every sport. Easy for other sports fans to follow. Then, at the time of the majors (which you'll get the broadest spectrum of viewer) you can explain the seedings as being based on the 52-week system. But that's it. The 52-week system need never be mentioned but 4 times a year.

And if they simply did it this way, we'll never have to hear Dallas say, "Serena won 2 majors but is ranked #4?"   :confused1: 

If for no other reason, do it for Dallas.


 :rofl_2:As if!...

I agree (to some extent).  I do think they have to keep the 52 for seeding.  Can you imaging at the beginning of the year some unknown plays a 250 tournament and win it, leads the 'race' rankings, and then they use that rankings for the next tournament to 'seed' players based on the race? :rofl_2:  So yes - I agree that the 52 needs to stay there for the seeding.  And that's why I'm glad we have the 52 because otherwise Roger wouldn't have broken Pete's record this year! :)~

But seriously, they do need to do something about the rankings.  People always say that in the end, the 'race' and 'rankings' will even out.  So maybe they know what they are doing.  However, you have some players who know how to play the system.  Like Caroline.  She played so many tournaments and racked up so many points that she stayed #1 for a while even though she did not win a major.  Also, I think she took advantage of the tour when no one else really wanted to stand up. Serena was out injured, Maria out injured, Victoria wasn't 'Victoria' yet, etc., so Caroline took that void and became #1. Not her fault - just the way the tour was determined.

Ok... I'm rambling... what was the original point? :rofl_2:  My previous point was that maybe, if Serena keeps playing, she will be #1 at the end of the year on paper too.  Right now, I know none of the WTA players would disagree that she's really NOT the #1 player right now, although technically, she's not. :rofl_2:


Offline Swish

  • Tennis God
  • ******
  • Posts: 10167
  • Gender: Male
  • How Many Times?
Re: WTA ranking points sytem for 2012!
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2012, 01:17:50 PM »
The ranking system is good.
The players have to put in enough tournaments to get the points.
 
Some players have trouble keeping their mental toughness for the whole year, so they don't get the points.