Author Topic: ATP Entry Rankings for January 14, 2013 (Read 766 times)

swish · « **on:** January 13, 2013, 06:56:47 PM »

http://www.stevegtennis.com/players-atp-rankings/

			`ATP Entry Rankings for January 14, 2013`

`Rank`	`Player`	`Nat`	`Pts This Week`	`Rank Diff`	`# Of Trn`	`Top 30, Pts Last Week`

`1`	`Djokovic, Novak`	`(SRB)`	`12,920`	`0`	`18`	`12,920`
`2`	`Federer, Roger`	`(SUI)`	`10,265`	`0`	`20`	`10,265`
`3`	`Murray, Andy`	`(GBR)`	`8,000`	`0`	`20`	`8,000`
`4`	`Nadal, Rafael`	`(ESP)`	`6,600`	`0`	`17`	`6,600`
`5`	`Ferrer, David`	`(ESP)`	`6,505`	`0`	`26`	`6,505`
`6`	`Berdych, Tomas`	`(CZE)`	`4,680`	`0`	`25`	`4,680`
`7`	`Del Potro, Juan Martin`	`(ARG)`	`4,480`	`0`	`22`	`4,480`
`8`	`Tsonga, Jo-Wilfried`	`(FRA)`	`3,375`	`0`	`25`	`3,375`
`9`	`Tipsarevic, Janko`	`(SRB)`	`3,090`	`0`	`28`	`3,090`
`10`	`Gasquet, Richard`	`(FRA)`	`2,720`	`0`	`23`	`2,720`
`11`	`Almagro, Nicolas`	`(ESP)`	`2,515`	`0`	`25`	`2,515`
`12`	`Monaco, Juan`	`(ARG)`	`2,430`	`0`	`24`	`2,430`
`13`	`Isner, John`	`(USA)`	`2,215`	`0`	`26`	`2,215`
`14`	`Cilic, Marin`	`(CRO)`	`2,210`	`0`	`24`	`2,210`
`15`	`Raonic, Milos`	`(CAN)`	`2,175`	`0`	`24`	`2,175`
`16`	`Simon, Gilles`	`(FRA)`	`2,145`	`0`	`27`	`2,145`
`17`	`Wawrinka, Stanislas`	`(SUI)`	`1,900`	`0`	`22`	`1,900`
`18`	`Nishikori, Kei`	`(JPN)`	`1,870`	`0`	`23`	`1,870`
`19`	`Kohlschreiber, Philipp`	`(GER)`	`1,830`	`0`	`27`	`1,830`
`20`	`Dolgopolov, Alexandr`	`(UKR)`	`1,750`	`0`	`26`	`1,750`
`21`	`Haas, Tommy`	`(GER)`	`1,720`	`0`	`21`	`1,720`
`22`	`Querrey, Sam`	`(USA)`	`1,650`	`0`	`27`	`1,650`
`23`	`Seppi, Andreas`	`(ITA)`	`1,595`	`0`	`30`	`1,595`
`24`	`Verdasco, Fernando`	`(ESP)`	`1,445`	`0`	`25`	`1,445`
`25`	`Youzhny, Mikhail`	`(RUS)`	`1,335`	`0`	`25`	`1,335`
`26`	`Janowicz, Jerzy`	`(POL)`	`1,299`	`0`	`23`	`1,299`
`27`	`Fish, Mardy`	`(USA)`	`1,255`	`0`	`20`	`1,255`
`28`	`Mayer, Florian`	`(GER)`	`1,215`	`0`	`29`	`1,215`
`29`	`Melzer, Jurgen`	`(AUT)`	`1,177`	`0`	`26`	`1,177`
`30`	`Klizan, Martin`	`(SVK)`	`1,175`	`0`	`26`	`1,175`
`31`	`Anderson, Kevin`	`(RSA)`	`1,170`	`5`	`27`
`32`	`Granollers, Marcel`	`(ESP)`	`1,125`	`1`	`26`
`33`	`Bellucci, Thomaz`	`(BRA)`	`1,112`	`-1`	`26`
`34`	`Stepanek, Radek`	`(CZE)`	`1,090`	`0`	`23`
`35`	`Baghdatis, Marcos`	`(CYP)`	`1,070`	`-4`	`24`
`36`	`Chardy, Jeremy`	`(FRA)`	`1,063`	`1`	`24`
`37`	`Troicki, Viktor`	`(SRB)`	`1,030`	`1`	`28`
`38`	`Benneteau, Julien`	`(FRA)`	`1,015`	`-3`	`26`
`39`	`Roddick, Andy`	`(USA)`	`1,015`	`0`	`24`
`40`	`Davydenko, Nikolay`	`(RUS)`	`1,015`	`0`	`25`
`41`	`Dimitrov, Grigor`	`(BUL)`	`1,008`	`0`	`23`
`42`	`Lopez, Feliciano`	`(ESP)`	`1,005`	`0`	`30`
`43`	`Tomic, Bernard`	`(AUS)`	`985`	`21`	`27`
`44`	`Lacko, Lukas`	`(SVK)`	`917`	`4`	`27`
`45`	`Andujar, Pablo`	`(ESP)`	`915`	`0`	`30`
`46`	`Paire, Benoit`	`(FRA)`	`900`	`-3`	`29`
`47`	`Fognini, Fabio`	`(ITA)`	`880`	`0`	`28`
`48`	`Matosevic, Marinko`	`(AUS)`	`845`	`1`	`29`
`49`	`Goffin, David`	`(BEL)`	`843`	`1`	`26`
`50`	`Istomin, Denis`	`(UZB)`	`840`	`-4`	`33`
`51`	`Ramos, Albert`	`(ESP)`	`830`	`0`	`30`
`52`	`Llodra, Michael`	`(FRA)`	`823`	`0`	`18`
`53`	`Haase, Robin`	`(NED)`	`800`	`1`	`30`
`54`	`Falla, Alejandro`	`(COL)`	`796`	`-1`	`29`
`55`	`Malisse, Xavier`	`(BEL)`	`791`	`7`	`26`
`56`	`Bautista Agut, Roberto`	`(ESP)`	`786`	`-1`	`26`
`57`	`Baker, Brian`	`(USA)`	`776`	`2`	`25`
`58`	`Zemlja, Grega`	`(SLO)`	`770`	`-2`	`25`
`59`	`Lorenzi, Paolo`	`(ITA)`	`769`	`-2`	`33`
`60`	`Mathieu, Paul-Henri`	`(FRA)`	`763`	`-2`	`24`
`61`	`Lu, Yen-Hsun`	`(TPE)`	`759`	`-1`	`29`
`62`	`Harrison, Ryan`	`(USA)`	`754`	`6`	`23`
`63`	`Hanescu, Victor`	`(ROU)`	`753`	`-2`	`27`
`64`	`Giraldo, Santiago`	`(COL)`	`743`	`-1`	`23`
`65`	`Sijsling, Igor`	`(NED)`	`738`	`5`	`24`
`66`	`Becker, Benjamin`	`(GER)`	`733`	`-1`	`28`
`67`	`Zeballos, Horacio`	`(ARG)`	`725`	`-1`	`27`
`68`	`Berlocq, Carlos`	`(ARG)`	`720`	`-1`	`31`
`69`	`Muller, Gilles`	`(LUX)`	`714`	`0`	`27`
`70`	`Nieminen, Jarkko`	`(FIN)`	`710`	`-26`	`29`
`71`	`Gimeno-Traver, Daniel`	`(ESP)`	`704`	`0`	`30`
`72`	`Mayer, Leonardo`	`(ARG)`	`702`	`0`	`23`
`73`	`Soeda, Go`	`(JPN)`	`701`	`0`	`29`
`74`	`Dodig, Ivan`	`(CRO)`	`692`	`0`	`27`
`75`	`Rosol, Lukas`	`(CZE)`	`679`	`0`	`31`
`76`	`Kubot, Lukasz`	`(POL)`	`675`	`0`	`26`
`77`	`Bedene, Aljaz`	`(SLO)`	`673`	`0`	`24`
`78`	`Phau, Bjorn`	`(GER)`	`672`	`0`	`27`
`79`	`Kuznetsov, Andrey`	`(RUS)`	`660`	`0`	`24`
`80`	`Bolelli, Simone`	`(ITA)`	`658`	`0`	`29`
`81`	`Hewitt, Lleyton`	`(AUS)`	`645`	`1`	`13`
`82`	`Donskoy, Evgeny`	`(RUS)`	`637`	`1`	`28`
`83`	`Nalbandian, David`	`(ARG)`	`635`	`1`	`18`
`84`	`Ito, Tatsuma`	`(JPN)`	`633`	`1`	`29`
`85`	`Garcia-Lopez, Guillermo`	`(ESP)`	`624`	`-4`	`29`
`86`	`Monfils, Gael`	`(FRA)`	`600`	`13`	`23`
`87`	`Volandri, Filippo`	`(ITA)`	`582`	`0`	`31`
`88`	`Levine, Jesse`	`(CAN)`	`580`	`16`	`26`
`89`	`Zopp, Jurgen`	`(EST)`	`579`	`-1`	`21`
`90`	`Kamke, Tobias`	`(GER)`	`577`	`-4`	`28`
`91`	`Ramirez Hidalgo, Ruben`	`(ESP)`	`577`	`-1`	`30`
`92`	`Rufin, Guillaume`	`(FRA)`	`574`	`-1`	`27`
`93`	`Kavcic, Blaz`	`(SLO)`	`569`	`0`	`30`
`94`	`Russell, Michael`	`(USA)`	`569`	`-2`	`27`
`95`	`Cipolla, Flavio`	`(ITA)`	`568`	`-1`	`28`
`96`	`Montanes, Albert`	`(ESP)`	`565`	`-1`	`25`
`97`	`Pella, Guido`	`(ARG)`	`564`	`-1`	`22`
`98`	`Darcis, Steve`	`(BEL)`	`561`	`-1`	`25`
`99`	`Ungur, Adrian`	`(ROU)`	`557`	`-1`	`28`
`100`	`Sousa, Joao`	`(POR)`	`552`	`0`	`32`
`101`	`Roger-Vasselin, Edouard`	`(FRA)`	`539`	`0`	`30`
`102`	`Stakhovsky, Sergiy`	`(UKR)`	`538`	`0`	`30`
`103`	`Karlovic, Ivo`	`(CRO)`	`536`	`0`	`19`
`104`	`Hajek, Jan`	`(CZE)`	`527`	`2`	`25`
`105`	`Kukushkin, Mikhail`	`(KAZ)`	`526`	`2`	`16`
`106`	`Mahut, Nicolas`	`(FRA)`	`515`	`2`	`21`
`107`	`Robredo, Tommy`	`(ESP)`	`515`	`2`	`17`
`108`	`Ebden, Matthew`	`(AUS)`	`509`	`-3`	`24`
`109`	`Haider-Maurer, Andreas`	`(AUT)`	`504`	`1`	`24`
`110`	`Berankis, Ricardas`	`(LTU)`	`501`	`1`	`19`
`111`	`Dutra Silva, Rogerio`	`(BRA)`	`498`	`1`	`29`
`112`	`Jaziri, Malek`	`(TUN)`	`491`	`1`	`25`
`113`	`Sela, Dudi`	`(ISR)`	`487`	`1`	`30`
`114`	`Bemelmans, Ruben`	`(BEL)`	`486`	`1`	`24`
`115`	`Alund, Martin`	`(ARG)`	`482`	`1`	`26`
`116`	`Andreev, Igor`	`(RUS)`	`479`	`1`	`20`
`117`	`De Schepper, Kenny`	`(FRA)`	`475`	`1`	`26`
`118`	`Ouanna, Josselin`	`(FRA)`	`474`	`1`	`27`
`119`	`Petzschner, Philipp`	`(GER)`	`472`	`1`	`22`
`120`	`Brands, Daniel`	`(GER)`	`469`	`1`	`24`
`121`	`Tursunov, Dmitry`	`(RUS)`	`464`	`1`	`21`
`122`	`Serra, Florent`	`(FRA)`	`453`	`1`	`26`
`123`	`Blake, James`	`(USA)`	`450`	`1`	`19`
`124`	`Bachinger, Matthias`	`(GER)`	`450`	`1`	`32`
`125`	`Smyczek, Tim`	`(USA)`	`448`	`1`	`20`
`126`	`Rochus, Olivier`	`(BEL)`	`447`	`-37`	`31`
`127`	`Pospisil, Vasek`	`(CAN)`	`447`	`1`	`27`
`128`	`de Bakker, Thiemo`	`(NED)`	`445`	`1`	`22`
`129`	`Sugita, Yuichi`	`(JPN)`	`441`	`1`	`25`
`130`	`Ram, Rajeev`	`(USA)`	`433`	`1`	`25`
`131`	`Souza, Joao`	`(BRA)`	`430`	`1`	`23`
`132`	`Veic, Antonio`	`(CRO)`	`429`	`1`	`26`
`133`	`Bogomolov Jr., Alex`	`(RUS)`	`422`	`-6`	`31`
`134`	`Gil, Frederico`	`(POR)`	`407`	`0`	`25`
`135`	`Berrer, Michael`	`(GER)`	`407`	`0`	`23`
`136`	`Kudla, Denis`	`(USA)`	`407`	`0`	`26`
`137`	`Viola, Matteo`	`(ITA)`	`405`	`0`	`29`
`138`	`Gulbis, Ernests`	`(LAT)`	`404`	`0`	`20`
`139`	`Gicquel, Marc`	`(FRA)`	`403`	`0`	`23`
`140`	`Marchenko, Illya`	`(UKR)`	`397`	`0`	`20`
`141`	`Elias, Gastao`	`(POR)`	`396`	`0`	`24`
`142`	`Delbonis, Federico`	`(ARG)`	`395`	`0`	`23`
`143`	`Beck, Karol`	`(SVK)`	`395`	`0`	`20`
`144`	`Odesnik, Wayne`	`(USA)`	`394`	`1`	`22`
`145`	`Alves, Thiago`	`(BRA)`	`386`	`1`	`24`
`146`	`Ignatik, Uladzimir`	`(BLR)`	`382`	`1`	`23`
`147`	`Dasnieres de Veigy, Jonathan`	`(FRA)`	`381`	`1`	`25`
`148`	`Chiudinelli, Marco`	`(SUI)`	`380`	`1`	`21`
`149`	`Sock, Jack`	`(USA)`	`375`	`3`	`19`
`150`	`Greul, Simon`	`(GER)`	`374`	`3`	`24`
`151`	`Cervantes, Inigo`	`(ESP)`	`372`	`-1`	`23`
`152`	`Udomchoke, Danai`	`(THA)`	`370`	`2`	`20`

Other AO entries:

237 John Patrick Smith AUS

233 Adrian Menendez Maceiras ESP

223 James Duckworth AUS

198 Arnau Brugues Davi ESP

196 Amir Weintraub ISR

194 Rhyne Williams USA

186 Di Wu CHN

184 John Millman AUS

175 Steve Johnson USA

174 Daniel Munoz De La Nava ESP

170 Adrian Mannarino FRA

164 Cedrik Marcel Stebe GER

156 Maxime Authom BEL

Babblelot · « **Reply #1 on:** January 13, 2013, 07:04:42 PM »

You're already worried

about Djokovic being a slamless #1 on January 13th...

I'll never understand you people.

sid · « **Reply #2 on:** January 13, 2013, 07:06:39 PM »

Nice post Swish be good to see who goes up & down the list.This should be made a sticky

swish · « **Reply #3 on:** January 13, 2013, 09:15:27 PM »

Thanks sid.

swish · « **Reply #4 on:** January 14, 2013, 06:04:04 PM »

Here's the day to day rankings.

Last years AO results are taken off and then day to day results are added.
Nadal has dropped to #5 as he lost last years AO points.

http://live-tennis.eu/

Alex · « **Reply #5 on:** January 15, 2013, 01:52:57 PM »

Quote from: swish on January 14, 2013, 06:04:04 PM

Here's the day to day rankings.
Last years AO results are taken off and then day to day results are added.
Nadal has dropped to #5 as he lost last years AO points.

http://live-tennis.eu/

swish, who is your daddy?

swish · « **Reply #6 on:** January 15, 2013, 04:09:44 PM »

Quote from: Alex on January 15, 2013, 01:52:57 PM

Quote from: swish on January 14, 2013, 06:04:04 PM
Here's the day to day rankings.
Last years AO results are taken off and then day to day results are added.
Nadal has dropped to #5 as he lost last years AO points.

http://live-tennis.eu/

swish, who is your daddy?

Missed your medication?

sid · « **Reply #7 on:** January 15, 2013, 04:57:02 PM »

Swish i see now Ferrer is above Nadal,but he is back playing on the 11th of February in Brazil,unless he pulls out of that.

Alex · « **Reply #8 on:** January 15, 2013, 05:15:45 PM »

Quote from: swish on January 15, 2013, 04:09:44 PM

Quote from: Alex on January 15, 2013, 01:52:57 PM
Quote from: swish on January 14, 2013, 06:04:04 PM
Here's the day to day rankings.
Last years AO results are taken off and then day to day results are added.
Nadal has dropped to #5 as he lost last years AO points.

http://live-tennis.eu/

swish, who is your daddy?

Missed your medication?

can't find my woman. she hasn't given me nothing

let's pick on Sid. Murray is not winning the AO. Tomic is

sid · « **Reply #9 on:** January 15, 2013, 05:38:11 PM »

Quote from: Alex on January 15, 2013, 05:15:45 PM

Quote from: swish on January 15, 2013, 04:09:44 PM
Quote from: Alex on January 15, 2013, 01:52:57 PM
Quote from: swish on January 14, 2013, 06:04:04 PM
Here's the day to day rankings.
Last years AO results are taken off and then day to day results are added.
Nadal has dropped to #5 as he lost last years AO points.

http://live-tennis.eu/

swish, who is your daddy?

Missed your medication?

can't find my woman. she hasn't given me nothing

let's pick on Sid. Murray is not winning the AO. Tomic is

Ok Alex @ least Nole's not then as well

sid · « **Reply #10 on:** February 15, 2013, 02:47:47 PM »

Roger is down to 9855 points after today.

http://live-tennis.eu/
Swish's link

Alex · « **Reply #11 on:** February 15, 2013, 03:21:23 PM »

Quote from: sid on February 15, 2013, 02:47:47 PM

Roger is down to 9855 points after today.
http://live-tennis.eu/
Swish's link

yeah, Murray is getting closer. The key for him to overtake #2 is to play really well at both IW and Miami plus to have a solid clay season. He can gain many points on dirt.

sid · « **Reply #12 on:** February 15, 2013, 03:48:51 PM »

Alex,Murray's working hard now for both IW and Miami,be a good chance he take one of them this year.Looks like Ivan Lendl is getting Andy ready for these 2 Masters & Clay.Tennis Schedule is also on Swish's link.
http://live-tennis.eu/playersSchedule

Alex · « **Reply #13 on:** February 15, 2013, 03:54:56 PM »

Quote from: sid on February 15, 2013, 03:48:51 PM

Alex,Murray's working hard now for both IW and Miami,be a good chance he take one of them this year.Looks like Ivan Lendl is getting Andy ready for these 2 Masters & Clay.Tennis Schedule is also on Swish's link.
http://live-tennis.eu/playersSchedule

yup, and both IW and Miami will be probably decided between Nole and Andy. I just don't see anybody else bothering them there, although you never know.

Litotes · « **Reply #14 on:** February 16, 2013, 06:17:01 AM »

Quote from: Alex on February 15, 2013, 03:54:56 PM

Quote from: sid on February 15, 2013, 03:48:51 PM
Alex,Murray's working hard now for both IW and Miami,be a good chance he take one of them this year.Looks like Ivan Lendl is getting Andy ready for these 2 Masters & Clay.Tennis Schedule is also on Swish's link.
http://live-tennis.eu/playersSchedule

yup, and both IW and Miami will be probably decided between Nole and Andy. I just don't see anybody else bothering them there, although you never know.

Djokovic was eliminated by Isner in IW last year, from an equally strong-looking position. And Murray has had many strange results there. Wouldn't surprise me to see an non-Nolandy winner this year also. Their collective chances appear much greater in Miami. With no Federer in the draw to possibly ensure an SF meet, I fully except them to meet in the final there.

swish · « **Reply #15 on:** February 16, 2013, 05:19:42 PM »

I got this post from FedererNadal13, elsewhere.

Nice breakdown.

Quote

Alright guys, now that the first major of the year is in the books, it's time to look at all of the ranking points and see what might happen at each stage of the year! This will be a comparison between Djokovic, Federer, and Murray, because Rafa was out for 6 months last year, and as a result, would make it hard to predict how he'll fare.

First, lets look at what's set in stone (points in January):

Djokovic: 2000 points

Federer: 720 points

Murray: 1450

Djokovic has built up a healthy lead in the race on Roger, and Murray has done his best to keep it close so far.

Now, let's Look at Now to Roland Garros:

Djokovic: 4120 points (Finals at RG, Win at Miami, finals at MC and Rome are the highlights)

Federer: 4125 points (Win at IW, win at Madrid, win at Rotterdam and Dubai, semis at RG are the highlights)

Murray: 1630 points (quarters at RG is the highlight)

So, let's think about this. Fed is already behind Novak by a huge amount, and he's actually defending more points than Novak up to and including Roland Garros. So, Fed reaching #1 is not very likely around here.

I can see Novak maintaining his numbers, it would be hard to improve but he could, it all depends on how Rafa does on clay I think.

I can see Roger losing major points here, as many as 2000, because he has so many wins to defend.

I can see Murray making major gains here, mainly because he has almost zero points to defend at IW and Miami, and a win here could really cut in to the Djok-Fed lead over him. Better clay results would really help too.

Now, Let's Check out the RG-SW19 points:

Djokovic: 990 points (semis at SW19 is the highlight)

Federer: 2600 (Win at Wimby and final at Olympics are the highlights)

Murray: 1950 (win at olympics and final at Wimby are the higlights)

So, once again, Fed has more points to defend than Novak. The Olympics points will drop off, which will affect Murray and Rog more than Novak. Roger needs to win Wimbledon to not lose major points here, and the same can be said for Murray. And improvement at wimby by Novak will stretch his lead.

SW19-USO

Djokovic: 2800 points: (USO final, Canada win, Cincy Final)

Fed: 1360 points: (Cincy win, USO quarters)

Murray: 2180 points: (USO win)

This is where Novak won #1 last year, from after Wimby to the end of the year. Novak has to play near perfectly in this stretch to keep all his points, but then again, there aren't as many available here, so even if Rog or Murray win everything Nole could still be #1 by a good margin.

Roger winning the USO would really boost his ranking, as well as playing the Roger's cup. Defending Cincy would really help as well

Murray can easily improve on his summer HC events other than USO, but he'll be hard-pressed to defend his USO.

USO-End of the year

Djokovic: 3010 points (Win in Shanghai, win at Beijing, and of course the WTF win)

Federer: 1460 points (final at WTF is the highlight)

Murray: 1090 points (finals at shanghai is the highlight)

So, once again, the end of the season is why Djokovic is currently #1 over Federer, since he has a big lead (3000ish points) on Roger. If Fed wins Shanghai, Paris, and the WTF in similar fashion to 2011, he could gain major ground. Murray too can improve his results here.

Conclusion:

2013 could be an interesting year for the rankings. The first half of the year will be where Murray can make up a lot of ground, and then the second half of the year is where Roger could make up ground. Novak has to defend a lot, but he's up around 3000 points to start the year, so he's allowed to have a few bad tourneys.

If Roger or Andy want to be #1, they don't have that same luxury.

Alex · « **Reply #16 on:** February 16, 2013, 05:24:06 PM »

the best thing is Nole is increasing his lead without playing any tennis. me likey

swish · « **Reply #17 on:** February 16, 2013, 05:27:44 PM »

Quote from: Alex on February 16, 2013, 05:24:06 PM

the best thing is Nole is increasing his lead without playing any tennis. me likey

Djokovic is pretty solid for awhile at #1.
But Murray looks to pass Fed soon.

Alex · « **Reply #18 on:** February 16, 2013, 05:44:13 PM »

Quote from: swish on February 16, 2013, 05:27:44 PM

Quote from: Alex on February 16, 2013, 05:24:06 PM
the best thing is Nole is increasing his lead without playing any tennis. me likey

Djokovic is pretty solid for awhile at #1.
But Murray looks to pass Fed soon.

It looks like it but I'm still not sure how Murray will perform during the clay season. Also, Murray didn't do very well in IW and Miaimi last year but we all know that he is more than capable winning there and gaining lots of points. On the other hand, not sure why is Fed skipping Miami. I do understand he want to reduce his schedule but still.

HarryWild · « **Reply #19 on:** February 16, 2013, 10:20:26 PM »

13 Isner, John
22 Querrey, Sam
27 Fish, Mardy
57 Baker, Brian
62 Harrison, Ryan
94 Russell, Michael
100 Sousa, Joao
125 Smyczek, Tim
130 Ram, Rajeev
136 Kudla, Denis
144 Odesnik, Wayne
149 Sock, Jack

Fish, Baker are injuried and are recovering mode.

But it looks like Querrey is going up in rankings since he is back in shape now.

Isner has to get his head back in shape. He is a little down on himself.

All the rest are trying to grind it out one step at a time it looks. Kind of surprise that Ryan is not higher in the rankings since in the 50-80 range.

Looks like Blake and Young are down for now in the Challenger tournaments.

News:

Author Topic: ATP Entry Rankings for January 14, 2013 (Read 766 times)