The "trial" was a disgrace, and anyone expecting it to reveal the truth and expose the culprits was naive, to say the least. I'm interested to know if Nadal said the truth should be revealed BEFORE it became clear that the blood samples would be destroyed, as it was always uncertain whether the names / identities would be revealed? What is the point of stating the obvious - that the test results should be revealed- after the court decided not to reveal them?
And whilst no one here is likely to know the truth, I agree with those who say that this outcome is damaging for the reputation of the sports world in Spain, and I for one will continue to doubt the integrity of the drugs monitors / regulators / enforcers there. The Spanish justice system is no less questionable, given how this trial was conducted.