I was just wondering what you thought of this idea:
Instead of showing the break point conversions during matches as the number of break pts converted / total # of break points, isn't it more useful to show "total number of games broken" / "Total games with a break point"? Does it really matter whether a person converted 3 break points out of 16, if those 16 points all came in the 3 games that the person broke in? Analysts would say that the player wasted their opportunities, but they took advantage by breaking in every game they had chances in.
Am I making any sense?
I am going to send this to Jon Wertheim's mailbag and see if I actually make it for the 1st time, hehe...