Well, correct me if I'm wrong, (I watched the two last sets only), but except the outstanding statistic numbers (especially winners, aces and differentials) I didn't see much of brilliant points or big rallies. In most of the cases the games gas finnishing 40-0 or 40-15 for both players.
I say that because some people came up and said this game was much better in quality than for instance Baghdatis-Hewitt. Not offending anybody, but what exactly does quality mean for you?
I guess I should watch the full match to get an overall opinion.
