Hi, I have an important question for you guys, please pay attention!
What exactly constitutes a highlight for you guys?
-My criteria is this:
-winners,
-spectacular rallies, although some may end in UEs
-there's more, I can't think specifically off the top of my head now, but here's where you guys can contribute.
My highlights of Federer vs. Benneteau are about 15 minutes long, so i am wondering whether I should prune out some points. But it's kinda hard to pick sometimes, especially when Benneteau is so consistent (which explains why he made it at least to the third round). I usually use my best judgment and pick out the good points to put into highlights, and leave it at that. It would be easier for me if I didn't have to spend too much time pruning out points, and just join together what I have. But I would like your input.
